<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technical writing antipatterns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://juliemelton.com/2008/08/11/technical-writing-antipatterns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://juliemelton.com/2008/08/11/technical-writing-antipatterns/</link>
	<description>Online home of Juliette Melton</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://juliemelton.com/2008/08/11/technical-writing-antipatterns/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliemelton.com/2008/08/11/technical-writing-antipatterns/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>Looks like someone was writing for an ex-boss of mine! His 'metric' for my 'worth' as a technical writer from one release to the next was how many more pages were in Release 4, compared to Release 3.

*My* metric for the same documentation was how many LESS pages there were. Fewer pages meant any or all of these:
* tighter writing and editing
* removal of topics no-one cared about or wanted, or that were repetitive of other topics (e.g. an 'add widget' and an 'edit widget' topic were often very similar and could be combined)
* more usable software that didn't require a 400 page manual to use it!

BTW, I no longer work for that company—and nor does he!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like someone was writing for an ex-boss of mine! His &#8216;metric&#8217; for my &#8216;worth&#8217; as a technical writer from one release to the next was how many more pages were in Release 4, compared to Release 3.</p>
<p>*My* metric for the same documentation was how many LESS pages there were. Fewer pages meant any or all of these:<br />
* tighter writing and editing<br />
* removal of topics no-one cared about or wanted, or that were repetitive of other topics (e.g. an &#8216;add widget&#8217; and an &#8216;edit widget&#8217; topic were often very similar and could be combined)<br />
* more usable software that didn&#8217;t require a 400 page manual to use it!</p>
<p>BTW, I no longer work for that company—and nor does he!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristin nienhuis</title>
		<link>http://juliemelton.com/2008/08/11/technical-writing-antipatterns/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>kristin nienhuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliemelton.com/2008/08/11/technical-writing-antipatterns/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>can't decide if i am "glad" to see this page or if I could have happily "existed" without... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t decide if i am &#8220;glad&#8221; to see this page or if I could have happily &#8220;existed&#8221; without&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
